GENDER INEQUALITY IN THE FIELD OF ARCHITECTURE IN INDIA


Gender equality is not only a fundamental human right but a necessary foundation for a prosperous and sustainable world. Providing equal access to education, public spaces, health care, decent work, and representation in decision-making processes ensure sustainable development. Biased language leads to biased technology which in turn leads to a biased environment.
Gender-based violence in urban and rural areas can be attributed to factors such as poverty, discrimination, exclusion and, lack of gender mainstreaming in urban development leading to public spaces and structures not catering to all genders equally.
Women are underrepresented in architecture not just at the top of the field but at all levels of practice. Even as women have been gradually increasing their numbers, they have mostly done so at lower ranks of both the academy and the profession.
Not surprisingly, then, the percentage of women in architecture radically decreases as one moves up the ladder toward more senior positions and prestigious honors. Female mentors and role models are in scarce supply. (Apart from Zaha Hadid how many female architects can you name?) And though women are growing in numbers in the lecture hall, they are underrepresented on course syllabuses, which can send a message that women are not valued as participants.
Many women choose not to enter the field after graduation due to low-paid jobs, no job security, no clarity for the future, and many more. Poor conditions during the work hours may include high stress and poor security. Women also think that the profession as an architect is inflexible which is not family-friendly. Long hours of job which may be a guilt trip and to manage work-life balance, motherhood, etc., Are the reasons for the female architects not to continue their job and choose to be lecturers or leave the profession in the industry.
In architecture, peer review dominates. When tenure decisions are made by committees made up of men, consist of interviews with mostly male candidates, and are sent to male provosts for approval system perpetuates itself. Female architects make less than their male counterparts at every level of experience. They are sidelined at every tread where their ideas are disregarded and die to paternalism in the workplace is also the reason for the limiting progression of the women in the field of architecture. So females should be included in the formation of any decision-making committee, to minimize the gender binaries in the industry.
Including women in the process of creating the space can insignificantly make that space gender-neutral. Taking gender-sensitive planning aspects, we can create a space, which feels safe for everybody. For example, converting football cages for activities that adapt both the genders, in this case, volleyball and badminton courts.
Correcting the elements that begin to play a larger part in designing the building of the future, and by self-correcting are all general biases we might design spaces that will work better for all.
Women architects want to be a good architect who has a meaningful impact they don't want to be known for being a 'good woman architect'. Architecture needs to look like the world it serves and that's everybody. Gender equality shouldn't only be limited to giving credit to female for their work, but she should also be involved.
Societal norms mean women are less likely to brag about their achievements because they disrupt gender expectations, which many believe Carrier limiting. Men tend to cite their achievements more than women, inevitably meaning their works are more widely publicized. Moreover, when women are interviewed they are more often asked questions about feminism and gender equality in the industry, rather than questions that focus on their work. The cumulative effect is that the architectural achievements of women suffer less promotion.
But in this era, gender binaries are reducing. Women in architecture are recognized and given importance in the industry. But they are not highlighted as the media is not bringing them into the light, by asking 'where are female architects?' and 'I can't name five female architects'. They are right here and these types of titles are not advancing the cases of gender bias. This adds to the misleading narrative that there are none out there. It's a negative story to suggest because there are truly so many. We should start writing about them and telling their unique stories to the world. They need to be discussed and approached thoughtfully. Showing their success, their reinventions of practices, and how they forged their own paths.
Female architects are doing well exceptionally by working and simultaneously running the business, acting as caregivers and making time to mentor. There are clearly many women who are architects, but the yardstick for evaluating good architecture and success is shortsighted.
As fast as India is concerned, it is an emerging and developing country. This fast-changing face of India is partly due to the brilliant architects in the country. Architecture strengthens the ties between the people and their environment and brings about positive social change. The study of year-wise registration of architects by the Council of Architecture, India shows the growth of number which proves that the countries economical growth increases the requirement of architects for further development. So, both are interdependent factors.  


The data mentioned above by the COA shows that the growth of the number of registered architects is very slow till 2014 since 2003, we can notice the sudden growth of the same from 2015 till 2017 again a sudden fall in the year 2018 in India. While women graduate from the architecture schools at near parity with men, less than 20 percent become licensed practitioners. In the field of architecture, women face a lot of genders discrimination in terms of retention, promotion, earnings, access to seniority, leadership opportunities or belief that their contribution has been taken seriously. In the field of architecture, women face a lot of genders discrimination in terms of retention, promotion, earnings, access to seniority, leadership opportunities or belief that their contribution has been taken seriously.
Few women have broken this gender barrier and came out successfully in their business. There are so many notable names who have achieved international fame and awards and are working towards a sustainable society. Here is a small description of five of the top women architects in India according to an article published by REALTY NXT on top women architects in India, whose talents know no boundaries. They are Brinda Somaya an Architect and Conservationist, Sheila is an internationally claimed Architect, Urban Designer, and Sustainability Expert. Chitra Vishwanath‘s Biome Environmental Solutions is a Bangalore-based design firm focused on ecology, architecture and, water. Shelia owns her architectural firm SKJ Architects in Mumbai with 15 women employees in her firm. She has diversified her activities to cover industrial buildings, educational institutions, bungalows, and interior design of large spaces. Anupama Kundoo has her focus set on material research and experimentation towards an architecture that has a low environmental impact and is appropriate to the socio-economic context (Achoriwala:2018). The status of these exceptionally brilliant architects cannot be generalized while assessing the status or level of empowerment of women architects in India.
But as per my opinion in general, in India, it’s not the profession of Architecture that discriminates, but it’s the social and family role that forces architect women to stay away from practicing in the field and make other choices for careers. So only the change in socio-cultural values will have more women architects practicing the profession. 

The above two charts represent the data of  the ratio of male and female architects in the year 2013 and 2019 mentioned by COA, India. This shows that the ratio of women architects registered has increased.
In the perspective of Vertica Dvivedi, Founder & Director, WADE ASIA according to the last available data, 41% of architecture graduates in the US were female, while only 20% were licensed women architects. In India, there are close to 91,000 architects. It is surprising to know the ratio of male to female in architecture schools. Today, the numbers of females far exceed men. So, as per Vertica India is surely going to have more women architects in the future.

Reading the above data given by COA we observe that 53 percent of women architects who are employed in the private sector do the drafting, 3D visuals, of the design made by other architects which are in general supposed to be the lowest rank of work in architecture field having minimum earnings. Design works are mostly done by chief architects and are rarely given to female architects who are mostly not willing to go for site visits and are more oriented to work inside the office and the scope of site visits is also not given to them for security reasons in the plea of women-specific vulnerability.                                                                              

It reflects clear-cut gender discrimination in work allocation in the field of architecture. The heavy concentration of women architects in the private sector also leads to casualization, marginalization, hiring and firing, and misutilization of cheap female labor of women architects in this field. We all want to be valued for the quality of the work we do, not framed by the fact of our gender. But despite our best efforts, we are not always in control of how others see us. Around 17 percentage of women architects are in the field of others which means they are doing personal work with or without payment, this is also a causal treatment of women architects in India. Women architect constitutes a major portion of 16.99 percentage women in this group get experience and training from renowned firms or degrees from renowned institutes and have established their independent firm. They are mostly located in developed cities of India and generally having a strong financial background. This is the most empowered group among the female architects who have established their carrier. Only 1.18 percentage of women architects are employed other than the Government sector, having a good paycheck. In the Government sector, only 1.4 percentage of women architects are employed who are getting a good salary in class one. If the government could have created more job opportunities the condition of women architects would have developed. This is a challenge on the part of the Government of India to create more job opportunities to empower women architects of our country. Women architects who are practicing as a partner are very minimum constituting 0.72 percentage in India. Women architects who are capable enough are taken as partners and who are relatives or space are also considered as partners exempting their capability and are taken as sleeping partners too. But this is also a promising section where empowered women architects can become practicing partners except the spousal and relative entrepreneur. Here women architects are not considered as architects having an independent human right who can also flourish as their male counterparts.



A/N: co-author -Pallavi K

Comments